St. Michael-Albertville, with a total of 32 goals in 14 games, shows a modest offensive capability, averaging 2.29 goals per game (GPG). Their defense appears to be a concern, conceding 60 goals (4.29 goals against per game, GAPG). Their power play (PP) efficiency is low at 10.3%, and their penalty kill (PK) percentage is 63.9%. The goalie stats reveal a save percentage (SV %) of .873 and a goals-against average (GAA) of 4.23, which might be areas of vulnerability.
On the other hand, Buffalo has exhibited stronger offensive and defensive statistics and an excellent goalie. They’ve scored 35 goals in 13 games, averaging 2.69 GPG. Defensively, they are more robust, with only 49 goals conceded (3.77 GAPG). Their power play efficiency is slightly lower than St. Michael-Albertville’s at 8.6%, but their penalty kill is significantly better at 68.4%. The goalie stats for Buffalo show a save percentage of .895 and a GAA of 3.72, indicating a more consistent performance in the net.
The key differences are in the special teams and goaltending. Buffalo’s strength lies in their defensive play, goaltending and penalty killing, which could counteract St. Michael-Albertville’s less efficient power play. However, St. Michael-Albertville might have an opportunity to exploit Buffalo’s slightly lower power play efficiency.
In summary, for St. Michael-Albertville to succeed, they need to focus on improving their defense and capitalizing on power play opportunities. Buffalo, meanwhile, will likely rely on their strong defensive play and goaltending to maintain their edge.
Duluth Denfeld comes into the game with a solid record. They have scored 47 goals in 15 games, averaging 3.13 goals per game (GPG), while conceding 41 goals (2.73 goals against per game, GAPG). Notably, their power play (PP) efficiency is impressive at 28.6%, and their penalty kill (PK) percentage stands strong at 80.5%. Their goalie statistics are noteworthy with a save percentage (SV %) of .916 and a goals-against average (GAA) of 2.68, indicating reliable goaltending.
Duluth East, on the other hand, shows a different style. They have an equal number of goals scored (47 in 16 games) but have conceded significantly more goals (69), resulting in a higher GAPG of 4.31. Their PP efficiency is lower at 23.1%, but their PK percentage is comparable at 70.5%. The goalie stats for Duluth East show a lower save percentage of .867 and a higher GAA of 4.22, which could be a potential weak point.
The game is likely to hinge on a few key aspects:
Eastview has demonstrated strong offensive capabilities, scoring 52 goals in 15 games, which translates to an average of 3.40 goals per game (GPG). Defensively, they have been robust, conceding only 35 goals (2.33 goals against per game, GAPG). Their power play (PP) efficiency stands at 13.1%, and their penalty kill (PK) percentage is impressive at 85.7%. The goalie statistics for Eastview are solid, with a save percentage (SV %) of .920 and a goals-against average (GAA) of 2.32, indicating a strong presence in the net.
Cretin-Derham Hall, on the other hand, has also shown a commendable performance. They have scored 44 goals in 13 games, averaging 3.38 GPG. Their defensive record is noteworthy, with only 25 goals conceded (1.92 GAPG). Their PP efficiency is slightly higher than Eastview’s at 14.3%, and their PK percentage is nearly on par at 85.4%. The goalie stats for Cretin-Derham Hall reveal a save percentage of .903 and a GAA of 1.92, reflecting effective goaltending.
Key aspects to watch in the game include:
Holy Family has exhibited a strong offensive performance this season. They have scored a remarkable 59 goals in just 12 games, averaging an impressive 4.92 goals per game (GPG). Their defensive record is equally commendable, conceding only 27 goals (2.25 goals against per game, GAPG). Their power play (PP) efficiency stands at a solid 27.3%, and their penalty kill (PK) percentage is outstanding at 88.6%. The goalie stats for Holy Family are strong, with a save percentage (SV %) of .915 and a goals-against average (GAA) of 2.22, suggesting reliable goaltending.
Holy Angels, on the other hand, has scored 54 goals in 14 games, averaging 3.86 GPG. They have conceded 41 goals, resulting in a GAPG of 2.93. Their PP efficiency is 22.9%, slightly lower than Holy Family’s, but their PK percentage is a bit weaker at 73.5%. The goalie stats for Holy Angels show a save percentage of .909 and a GAA of 2.90, which are decent but not as strong as Holy Family’s.
Key aspects of the game to watch include:
Lakeville South has shown a balanced performance throughout the season. They have netted 49 goals in 14 games, averaging 3.50 goals per game (GPG). Their defensive record is relatively close, conceding 47 goals (3.36 goals against per game, GAPG). A standout feature for Lakeville South is their power play (PP) efficiency, which is quite high at 28.8%. Their penalty kill (PK) percentage is also strong at 85.7%. The goalie stats for Lakeville South indicate a save percentage (SV %) of .894 and a goals-against average (GAA) of 3.36, suggesting a decent performance in the net.
Prior Lake, on the other hand, has scored 41 goals in 15 games, averaging 2.73 GPG. They have allowed 47 goals against them, resulting in a GAPG of 3.13. Their PP efficiency is slightly lower than Lakeville South’s at 15.5%, but their PK percentage is commendable at 86.7%. The goalie stats for Prior Lake show a lower save percentage of .859 and a higher GAA of 3.08 compared to their opponents.
Key aspects to consider for this game include:
