Providence Academy’s Performance: Providence Academy has scored 47 goals in 13 games, averaging 3.62 goals per game (GPG). However, their defense has been more permeable, allowing 4.54 goals against per game (GAPG). They have a decent power play success rate of 21.1%, with 8 power play goals. The team’s goaltending has a save percentage (SV %) of .850 and a goals-against average (GAA) of 4.86.
Orono’s Performance: Orono presents a slightly more balanced performance. They have netted 43 goals in 11 games, averaging 3.91 GPG. Their defense is stronger, conceding an average of 2.73 GAPG. Orono’s power play is effective at 23.3%, and their goaltending is solid with a SV % of .877 and a GAA of 2.72, including 2 shutouts.
Matchup Analysis: This matchup will test Providence Academy’s offense against Orono’s more robust defense. Providence Academy will need to capitalize on their scoring opportunities while finding ways to bolster their defense.
Special Teams: Both teams have effective power plays, but Orono holds a slight edge in penalty killing. Providence Academy’s challenge will be to manage Orono’s power play while making the most of their own.
Prediction: Orono enters the game with a statistical advantage, especially in defense and goaltending. Providence Academy, with their potent offense, will need to be at their best to overcome Orono’s balanced approach.
Eastview’s Season so Far: Eastview has been impressive defensively, allowing only 2.50 goals against per game over 12 games, and scoring at an average of 3.42 goals per game. Their power play efficiency stands at 13.7%, and their goaltending has been a highlight, boasting a .918 save percentage and a 2.49 goals-against average, including two shutouts.
Rosemount’s Offensive Edge: On the other side, Rosemount has demonstrated a high-octane offense, with an average of 4.38 goals per game across 13 games. Despite a slightly higher goals-against average of 2.62, their power play success rate of 21.2% is noteworthy. Rosemount’s goaltending mirrors Eastview’s in save percentage, set at .874.
Strategic Matchup: This game will likely pivot on Eastview’s ability to stifle Rosemount’s attacking prowess. Eastview’s defense and goaltending will be key in their strategy to counter Rosemount’s aggressive offense.
Special Teams Battle: Special teams could play a pivotal role, with Rosemount holding the edge in power play efficiency. Eastview will need to maintain discipline to avoid penalties and leverage their strong penalty killing to keep Rosemount at bay.
Predictions: Rosemount might come in as slight favorites due to their offensive strength, but Eastview’s defensive resilience cannot be underestimated. It’s set to be a battle where strategy and execution will determine the victor.
Hermantown’s Stronghold: Hermantown has had a solid season, scoring 33 goals in 11 games, averaging 3.00 goals per game (GPG). Their defense has been particularly impressive, allowing only 1.55 goals against per game (GAPG). The team’s goaltending is stellar, with a save percentage (SV %) of .948 and a goals-against average (GAA) of 1.50, including 2 shutouts. However, their power play efficiency is lower at 9.1%.
Rock Ridge’s Offensive Prowess: Rock Ridge has demonstrated remarkable offensive capabilities, scoring 48 goals in 10 games, averaging 4.80 GPG. Their defense allows 1.90 GAPG, and they have a strong goaltending record with a SV % of .926 and a GAA of 1.87. Notably, Rock Ridge excels in power plays with a 24.3% success rate.
Matchup Dynamics: This game is set to be a battle between Hermantown’s robust defense and Rock Ridge’s potent offense. Hermantown’s challenge will be to contain Rock Ridge’s aggressive attack, while Rock Ridge will aim to penetrate Hermantown’s strong defensive line.
Special Teams: Rock Ridge has the edge in power play situations, which could be crucial in this matchup. Hermantown, with their efficient penalty killing, will need to be disciplined and avoid penalties.
Overview: In what’s shaping up to be a closely matched hockey game, Delano faces off against Chanhassen. Both teams have displayed impressive performances throughout the season, with Delano showcasing a balanced attack and Chanhassen demonstrating exceptional defense and goaltending.
Delano’s Season So Far: Delano has scored a total of 43 goals in 12 games, averaging 3.58 goals per game (GPG), and allowed 3.17 goals against per game (GAPG). Their power play has been effective with a 14.6% success rate. The team’s goaltending has been solid, with a save percentage (SV %) of .891 and a goals-against average (GAA) of 3.07, including 2 shutouts.
Chanhassen’s Dominant Performance: Chanhassen stands out with its offensive prowess, netting 54 goals in 13 games, averaging 4.15 GPG, and a notably low GAPG of 1.23. Their power play efficiency is remarkable at 25.7%. Impressively, their goaltending boasts a .946 SV % and a GAA of 1.22, with 3 shutouts.
Matchup Dynamics: This game will likely pivot on Delano’s ability to penetrate Chanhassen’s robust defense and exceptional goaltending. Chanhassen, on the other hand, will aim to maintain their high scoring against Delano’s competitive defense.
Special Teams Battle: Chanhassen holds a significant edge in power play efficiency, which could play a crucial role in this matchup. Delano will need to capitalize on their power play opportunities and maintain strong penalty killing.
Prediction: Chanhassen enters the game with a statistical advantage, especially in defense and goaltending. Delano, with their balanced play, will need to be at their best to overcome Chanhassen’s strong defense and high-scoring offense.
Proctor’s Balanced Strength: Proctor has scored 54 goals in 14 games, averaging 3.86 goals per game (GPG). They have a solid defense, allowing 2.43 goals against per game (GAPG). Their power play success rate stands at 17.3%, with 9 goals scored. The team’s goaltending has been reliable, with a save percentage (SV %) of .906 and a goals-against average (GAA) of 2.42, including 3 shutouts.
Duluth Denfeld’s Offensive Edge: Duluth Denfeld presents a strong offensive capability, netting 44 goals in 12 games, averaging 3.67 GPG. Their defense allows 2.92 GAPG. Notably, Duluth Denfeld excels in power plays with an impressive 31.0% success rate. Their goaltending has a SV % of .910 and a GAA of 2.86.
Matchup Dynamics: This game will likely feature a contest between Proctor’s balanced play and Duluth Denfeld’s aggressive power play strategy. Proctor’s challenge will be to contain Duluth Denfeld’s power play while capitalizing on their own scoring opportunities.
Special Teams: Duluth Denfeld has the advantage in power play efficiency, which could be a deciding factor. Proctor’s penalty killing will be tested, and they will need to be disciplined to minimize Duluth Denfeld’s power play chances.
Prediction: Duluth Denfeld’s effective power play might give them an edge, but Proctor’s stronger defense and goaltending could balance the scales. The game is set to be a competitive clash, possibly decided by special teams’ performance.
Andover’s Season Highlights: Andover has maintained a solid performance, scoring 42 goals in 12 games, averaging 3.50 goals per game (GPG). They have a respectable defense, allowing 3.17 goals against per game (GAPG). Their power play efficiency stands at 28.9%, with 11 power play goals. The team’s goaltending has been reliable, with a save percentage (SV %) of .900 and a goals-against average (GAA) of 3.17, including 1 shutout.
Maple Grove’s Dominant Performance: Maple Grove presents a formidable offensive threat, netting 53 goals in 10 games, averaging 5.30 GPG. Their defense has been notably strong, conceding only 1.80 GAPG. While their power play success rate is slightly lower at 14.7%, their goaltending is impressive with a SV % of .915 and a GAA of 1.80, along with 4 shutouts.
Matchup Analysis: The game will likely showcase a contest between Maple Grove’s high-scoring offense and Andover’s balanced play. Andover will need to leverage their power play and solid goaltending to counter Maple Grove’s potent attack.
Special Teams: Maple Grove has a slightly lower power play efficiency, but their penalty killing is strong. Andover’s advantage in power play efficiency could be key, especially against Maple Grove’s formidable defense.
Prediction: Maple Grove comes into the game with an offensive advantage and strong defensive records. However, Andover’s effective power play and solid goaltending could make this a closely contested match.
Edina’s Defensive Dominance: Edina comes into the game with an impressive record, having scored 39 goals in 11 games, averaging 3.55 goals per game (GPG). Their defensive prowess is notable, allowing only 1.27 goals against per game (GAPG). They have an excellent power play success rate of 24.1%, and their goaltending is outstanding with a save percentage (SV %) of .947 and a goals-against average (GAA) of 1.27, including 3 shutouts.
Lakeville South’s Offensive Edge: Lakeville South presents a formidable offensive force, netting 38 goals in 10 games, averaging 3.80 GPG. However, their defense allows an average of 3.60 GAPG. They excel in power plays with a success rate of 34.1%. Their goaltending has a SV % of .892 and a GAA of 3.60.
Matchup Dynamics: This game will likely feature a contest between Edina’s robust defense and goaltending and Lakeville South’s high-scoring offense. Lakeville South will need to penetrate Edina’s strong defensive line while also bolstering their own defense.
Special Teams: Lakeville South has an advantage in power play efficiency, which could be crucial in this matchup. Edina, with their efficient penalty killing and strong power play, will look to capitalize on any power play opportunities.
Prediction: Edina’s defensive strength and exceptional goaltending might give them the edge in this matchup. However, Lakeville South’s potent offense and strong power play performance present a significant challenge.
St. Thomas Academy’s Formidable Defense: St. Thomas Academy has scored 43 goals in 12 games, averaging 3.58 goals per game (GPG). Their defense is notably strong, allowing only 2.17 goals against per game (GAPG). They have a power play success rate of 18.8%, and their goaltending has been reliable with a save percentage (SV %) of .899 and a goals-against average (GAA) of 2.14, including 2 shutouts.
Benilde-St. Margaret’s Offensive Edge: Benilde-St. Margaret’s presents a potent offensive threat, netting 40 goals in 10 games, averaging 4.00 GPG. However, their defense allows an average of 1.80 GAPG. Notably, their power play efficiency is exceptional at 34.5%. Their goaltending has a SV % of .910 and a GAA of 1.77.
Matchup Analysis: This game is set to be a contest between St. Thomas Academy’s robust defense and Benilde-St. Margaret’s high-scoring offense. St. Thomas Academy will need to leverage their defensive strength and goaltending to counter Benilde-St. Margaret’s attackers.
Special Teams: Benilde-St. Margaret’s has an advantage in power play efficiency, which could be a crucial factor in this matchup. St. Thomas Academy’s penalty killing will be tested, and they will need to be disciplined to minimize Benilde-St. Margaret’s power play chances.
Prediction: Benilde-St. Margaret’s offensive prowess and effective power play might give them an edge, but St. Thomas Academy’s solid defense and goaltending could make it a closely contested match.
